Difference between revisions of "Partitioning Cache Data"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
ADAH2 518 3.94 3.95 | ADAH2 518 3.94 3.95 | ||
BPL2 519 3.94 3.95 | BPL2 519 3.94 3.95 | ||
| − | 35.76 35.91 | + | 35.76 35.91 -12.52% -12.49%</nowiki> |
''1+6'' with 4 additional nodes | ''1+6'' with 4 additional nodes | ||
| − | <nowiki>au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB | + | <nowiki>au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB |
| − | ADAH 503 2.60 2.61 -35.35% -49.11% | + | ADAH 503 2.60 2.61 -35.35% -49.11% |
| − | + | AUB 425 3.16 3.17 -45.37% -38.13% | |
| − | AUB 425 3.16 3.17 -45.37% -38.13% | + | BPL 405 2.47 2.48 -47.94% -51.57% |
| − | + | SHC 408 2.83 2.84 -47.56% -44.66% | |
| − | BPL 405 2.47 2.48 -47.94% -51.57% | + | TROY 401 3.34 3.35 -48.46% -34.68% |
| − | + | UAB 413 2.50 2.51 -46.92% -51.13% | |
| − | SHC 408 2.83 2.84 -47.56% -44.66% | + | UAT 740 4.79 4.81 -4.88% -6.23% |
| − | TROY 401 3.34 3.35 -48.46% -34.68% | + | UNA 357 2.97 2.98 -54.11% -41.96% |
| − | UAB 413 2.50 2.51 -46.92% -51.13% | + | ADAH2 407 2.52 2.54 |
| − | UAT 740 4.79 4.81 -4.88% -6.23% | + | AUB2 501 3.25 3.26 |
| − | + | BPL2 457 2.86 2.87 | |
| − | + | UAT2 428 2.48 2.49 | |
| − | 35.76 35.91</nowiki> | + | 35.76 35.91 -41.32% -39.68%</nowiki> |
Looking at ''1+5'' which is 6 discrete nodes in the network (double quorum), base storage decrease is 25% with no additional nodes. ''1+5'' with 4 additional nodes achieves a staggering 50% on average per node storage reduction. | Looking at ''1+5'' which is 6 discrete nodes in the network (double quorum), base storage decrease is 25% with no additional nodes. ''1+5'' with 4 additional nodes achieves a staggering 50% on average per node storage reduction. | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<nowiki> | <nowiki> | ||
au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB | au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB | ||
| − | ADAH 581 3. | + | ADAH 581 3.83 3.85 -25.32% -24.87% |
| − | AUB 539 3. | + | AUB 539 3.97 3.99 -30.72% -22.12% |
| − | BPL 537 3. | + | BPL 537 3.72 3.73 -30.98% -27.13% |
| − | SHC 590 3. | + | SHC 590 3.36 3.38 -24.16% -34.07% |
| − | TROY 555 3. | + | TROY 555 3.79 3.81 -28.66% -25.71% |
| − | UAB 572 3. | + | UAB 572 3.68 3.70 -26.48% -27.87% |
| − | UAT 757 4. | + | UAT 757 4.92 4.93 -2.70% -3.68% |
| − | UNA 536 3. | + | UNA 536 3.34 3.35 -31.11% -34.56% |
| − | 30. | + | 30.65 30.78 -25.02% -25.00%</nowiki> |
''1+5'' with 4 additional nodes | ''1+5'' with 4 additional nodes | ||
| − | <nowiki>au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB | + | <nowiki>au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB |
| − | ADAH 395 1. | + | ADAH 395 1.95 1.96 -49.23% -61.80% |
| − | + | AUB 349 2.90 2.91 -55.14% -43.30% | |
| − | AUB 349 2. | + | BPL 463 2.77 2.78 -40.49% -45.74% |
| − | + | SHC 350 2.94 2.95 -55.01% -42.46% | |
| − | BPL 463 2. | + | TROY 327 1.83 1.84 -57.97% -64.18% |
| − | + | UAB 331 2.10 2.11 -57.46% -58.88% | |
| − | SHC 350 2. | + | UAT 736 4.85 4.87 -5.40% -5.02% |
| − | TROY 327 1.83 1. | + | UNA 312 2.37 2.38 -59.90% -53.55% |
| − | UAB 331 2. | + | ADAH2 332 2.06 2.07 |
| − | UAT 736 4. | + | AUB2 328 2.52 2.53 |
| − | + | BPL2 367 2.53 2.54 | |
| − | + | UAT2 377 1.83 1.84 | |
| − | 30.65 30.78 </nowiki> | + | 30.65 30.78 -47.57% -46.87%</nowiki> |
Revision as of 08:43, 17 June 2013
Partitioning Cache Data
Quorum in the network is 3. (This is down from the previous value of 4... find out why).
Any sort of partitioning strategy would need to be implemented at the titledb.xml level. Title AUs can be assigned to peers centrally, and each peer should receive a custom titledb.xml file. If LOCKSS is unwilling to support that then there is alternative using local parameters.
org.lockss.titleDbs = http://bpldb.bplonline.org/etc/adpn/titledb-local.xml
Implementing a 1 + 6 partitioning strategy can save 12% on average for each network node. 1 + 6 indicates AU owner + 6 additional network nodes. Adding 2 additional nodes to the network can decrease per node storage by an average of 30%. Adding 4 additional nodes and partitioning cache data can save per node storage on average of 41%. This means we could store up to 18 TB of data on 10.6 TB nodes.
Implementing a 1 + 5 which is 6 discrete nodes in the network (double quorum), base storage decrease is 25% with no additional nodes. 1 + 5 with 4 additional nodes achieves a staggering 50% on average per node storage reduction.
All nodes (default configuration)
au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB ADAH 778 5.11 5.13 AUB 778 5.11 5.13 BPL 778 5.11 5.13 SHC 778 5.11 5.13 TROY 778 5.11 5.13 UAB 778 5.11 5.13 UAT 778 5.11 5.13 UNA 778 5.11 5.13 40.88 41.04
Doesn’t include vacated publisher AUs (which is between 500 and 600 GB).
1 + 6 no additional nodes
au_host AUCount ContentSize DiskCost count size cost ADAH 667 4.60 4.62 -14.27% -9.99% -9.97% AUB 676 3.83 3.85 -13.11% -25.00% -24.94% BPL 669 4.49 4.51 -14.01% -12.19% -12.15% SHC 666 4.48 4.49 -14.40% -12.41% -12.41% TROY 666 4.29 4.30 -14.40% -16.13% -16.09% UAB 667 4.58 4.60 -14.27% -10.29% -10.26% UAT 767 5.06 5.09 -1.41% -0.89% -0.86% UNA 667 4.43 4.45 -14.27% -13.27% -13.23% 35.76 35.91 -12.52% -12.49%
1 + 6 with 2 additional nodes
au_host AUCount ContentSize DiskCost count size cost ADAH 519 3.93 3.95 -33.29% -23.00% -22.98% AUB 540 3.21 3.23 -30.59% -37.15% -37.09% BPL 522 3.09 3.11 -32.90% -39.49% -39.44% SHC 519 3.22 3.23 -33.29% -36.97% -36.96% TROY 519 3.26 3.28 -33.29% -36.15% -36.09% UAB 519 3.02 3.03 -33.29% -40.93% -40.89% UAT 751 4.89 4.91 -3.47% -4.40% -4.38% UNA 519 3.26 3.28 -33.29% -36.15% -36.09% ADAH2 518 3.94 3.95 BPL2 519 3.94 3.95 35.76 35.91 -12.52% -12.49%
1+6 with 4 additional nodes
au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB ADAH 503 2.60 2.61 -35.35% -49.11% AUB 425 3.16 3.17 -45.37% -38.13% BPL 405 2.47 2.48 -47.94% -51.57% SHC 408 2.83 2.84 -47.56% -44.66% TROY 401 3.34 3.35 -48.46% -34.68% UAB 413 2.50 2.51 -46.92% -51.13% UAT 740 4.79 4.81 -4.88% -6.23% UNA 357 2.97 2.98 -54.11% -41.96% ADAH2 407 2.52 2.54 AUB2 501 3.25 3.26 BPL2 457 2.86 2.87 UAT2 428 2.48 2.49 35.76 35.91 -41.32% -39.68%
Looking at 1+5 which is 6 discrete nodes in the network (double quorum), base storage decrease is 25% with no additional nodes. 1+5 with 4 additional nodes achieves a staggering 50% on average per node storage reduction.
1+5 with no additional nodes
au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB ADAH 581 3.83 3.85 -25.32% -24.87% AUB 539 3.97 3.99 -30.72% -22.12% BPL 537 3.72 3.73 -30.98% -27.13% SHC 590 3.36 3.38 -24.16% -34.07% TROY 555 3.79 3.81 -28.66% -25.71% UAB 572 3.68 3.70 -26.48% -27.87% UAT 757 4.92 4.93 -2.70% -3.68% UNA 536 3.34 3.35 -31.11% -34.56% 30.65 30.78 -25.02% -25.00%
1+5 with 4 additional nodes
au_host AUCount ContentSize in TB DiskCost in TB ADAH 395 1.95 1.96 -49.23% -61.80% AUB 349 2.90 2.91 -55.14% -43.30% BPL 463 2.77 2.78 -40.49% -45.74% SHC 350 2.94 2.95 -55.01% -42.46% TROY 327 1.83 1.84 -57.97% -64.18% UAB 331 2.10 2.11 -57.46% -58.88% UAT 736 4.85 4.87 -5.40% -5.02% UNA 312 2.37 2.38 -59.90% -53.55% ADAH2 332 2.06 2.07 AUB2 328 2.52 2.53 BPL2 367 2.53 2.54 UAT2 377 1.83 1.84 30.65 30.78 -47.57% -46.87%